Response of Trinexapac-ethyl-treated wheat to glyphosate drift
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18779/cyt.v18i1.820Palavras-chave:
growth regulator, subdose, Triticum aestivum, yieldResumo
The herbicide drift is problem in crops when it reaches non-target crops. The glyphosate drift after growth regulator application can influence in wheat response. This study assessed the effects of glyphosate drift after trinexapac-ethyl application on wheat. Two field experiments were conducted in winter season of 2018 and 2019. Cultivar TBIO Toruk and Sossego cultivars were used in 2018 and cultivar TBIO Audaz and Cultivar ORS Citrino in 2019. Wheat cultivars were treated with trinexapac-ethyl followed subdoses of glyphosate ranging from 0 to 72 g ae ha-1. The phytotoxicity from glyphosate was less than 10% to para Cultivar TBIO Toruk and Sossego. Glyphosate symptoms were slightly higher in cultivar TBIO Audaz cultivar treated with trinexapac-ethyl. The isolated effects of Trinexapac-ethyl and glyphosate reduced plant height, but the interaction of trinexapac-ethyl and glyphosate factors had a greater reduction on plant height in 2019. The interaction between trinexapac-ethyl and glyphosate promoted more damage than they alone. Glyphosate reduced by up 11% cultivar TBIO Toruk yield but increase around 30% to cultivar Sossego yield. Cultivar TBIO Audaz was the most sensitive cultivar, with yield losses of up to 59% due to glyphosate drift. Overall, the effect of glyphosate on plant height was subdose dependent. Subsequent application of trinexapac-ethyl to plants exposed to the highest glyphosate subdoses resulted in decreased plant height and dry matter accumulation. Trinexapac-ethyl has no impact on wheat yield. The yield response was dependent of glyphosate subdose, cultivar and year.
Downloads
Referências
Almeida, D.P., Ferreira, M.C., Decaro Jr, S.T., Yamauchi, A.K., & Agostini. A.R. (2015). Droplets size categories and application volumes in burndown of plant covers. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 14(1):73-82. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v14i1.280
Almeida Moreira, B. R., da Silva Viana, R., Monteiro de Figueiredo, P. A., Manzani Lisboa, L. A., Tadao Miasaki, C., Chagas Magahães, A., Bispo Ramos, S., de Almeida Viana, C. R., Dias Rezende Trindade, V., & May, A. (2020). Glyphosate plus carboxylic compounds boost activity of free radical-scavenging enzymes in sugarcane. Agriculture, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040106
Baldwin, C.M., Brede, A.D., & Mayer, J.J. (2015). Growth regulation and tank mixing associated with a glyphosate-tolerant perennial ryegrass cultivar. Hort Technology, 25(2), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.25.2.214
Bearss, R.C., Patton, A.J., Brosnan, J.T., & Breeden, G.K. (2021). Postemergence smooth crabgrass control is not influenced by herbicide combinations with trinexapac-ethyl. Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management, 7(1): e20082. https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20082
Belz, R.G., & Duke, S.O. (2014). Herbicide and plant hormesis. Pest Management Science, 70(5), 698-707. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3726
Belz, R.G., & Sinkkonen, A. (2021). Low glyphosate doses change reproduction and produce tolerant offspring in dense populations of Hordeum vulgare. Pest Management Science, 77(10), 4770-4784. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6522
Belz, R.G., & Sinkkonen, A. (2019). Low toxin doses change plant size distribution in dense populations – glyphosate exposed Hordeum vulgare as a greenhouse case study. Environment International, 132, 105072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105072
Davis, B., Scott, R.C., Norsworthy, J.K., & Gbur. E.E. (2013). Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to low rates of glyphosate and glufosinate. Crop Protection, 54, 181-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.07.018
Deeds, Z., Al-Khatib, K., Peterson, D.E., & Stahlman, P.W. (2006). Wheat response to simulated drift of glyphosate and imazamox applied at two growth stages. Weed Technology, 20(1): 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-273R.1
Duke, S.O. (2015) Perspectives on transgenic, herbicide-resistant crops in the United States almost 20 years after introduction. Pest Management Science, 71(5):652-657. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3863
Gandolfo, M.A., Carvalho, F.K., Chechetto, R.G., Gandolfo, U.D., & Moraes, E.D. (2014). Effect of working pressure at different spray nozzles on drift quantification in wind tunnel. Engenharia Agrícola, 34(1), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162014000100008
Hawerroth, M.C., Gonzalez da Silva, J.A.G., Souza, C.A., Oliveira, A.C., Luche, H.S., Zimmer, C.M., Hawerroth F.J., & Schiavo, J. (2015). Redução do acamamento em aveia branca com o uso de regulador de crescimento ethyl- trinexapac. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 50(2): 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2015000200003
Kelley, K. B., Wax, L.M., Hager, A.G., & Riechers, D.E. (2005). Soybean response to plant growth regulator herbicides is affected by other postemergence herbicides. Weed Science, 53(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-078R
Kleczewski, N.M., & Whaley, C. (2018). Assessing the utility of the growth regulator trinexapac-ethyl and fungicides in mid-Atlantic soft red winter wheat production systems. Crop Protection, 104, 60-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.10.011
Lassiter, B. R., Burke, I., Thomas, W., Pline-Srnic, W. A., Jordan, D., Wilcut, J. W., & Wilkerson, G. (2007). Yield and physiological response of peanut to glyphosate drift. Weed technology: a journal of the Weed Science Society of America, 21(4), 954–960. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-045.1
Mccoy, J., Golden, B., Bond, J., Dodds, D., Bararpour, T., & Gore, J. (2021). Rice response to sublethal concentrations of paraquat, glyphosate, saflufenacil, and sodium chlorate at multiple late-season application timings as influenced by exposure. Weed Technology, 35(6), 980-990. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2021.61
Mccullough, P.E., & Hart, S.E. (2010). Trinexapac-ethyl influences bispyribac-sodium absorption and efficacy for annual bluegrass (Poa annua) control in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Weed Technology, 24(3), 326–331. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-08-015.1
Miziniak, W., & Matysiak, K. (2016). Two tank-mix adjuvants effect on yield and quality attributes of wheat treated with growth retardants. Ciência Rural, 46(9), 1559-1565. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150842
Pio de Oliveira, G.M.P., Gandolfo, M.A., Dalazen, G., Osipe, J.B., Pio de Oliveira, S.M.P., & Silva, M.A.A. (2021). Regression analysis to evaluate herbicide drift and injury in Roundup Ready cotton in wind tunnel. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 52(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20210025
Perkins, D.B., Abi-Akar F., Goodwin, G., & Brain, R.A. (2022) Characterization of field-scale spray drift deposition and non-target plant biological sensitivity: a corn herbicide (mesotrione/s-metolochlor) case study. Pest Management Science, 78(7), 3193-3206. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6950.
Roider, C.A., Griffin, J.L., Harrison, S.A., & Jones, C.A. (2007). Wheat response to simulated glyphosate drift. Weed Technology, 21(4), 1010-1015. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-073.1
SBCPD - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas. (1995). Procedimentos para instalação, avaliação e análise de experimentos com herbicidas. Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência de Plantas Daninhas.
Silva, D.R.O., Silva, A.A.A., Novello, B.D., Rieder, E., Aguiar, A.C.M., & Basso, C.J. (2020). Nitrogen availability and glyphosate hormesis on white oat. Planta Daninha, 38, e020230864. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100071
Shah, A.N., Tanveer, M., Rehman, A.U., Anjum, S.A., Iqbal, J., & Ahmad, R. (2016) Lodging stress in cereal-effects and management: an overview. Environmental Science Pollution Research International, 24(6), 5222-5237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8237-1.
Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2004). Fisiologia Vegetal. Artmed. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4242361/
Wiersma, J.J., & Durgan, B.R. (2017). Spring wheat response to simulated glyphosate drift. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management, 3(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.2134/cftm2017.09.0066
Zagonel, J., & Fernandes, E.C. (2007). Doses e épocas de aplicacao de redutor de crescimento afetando cultivares de trigo em duas doses de nitrogênio. Planta Daninha, 25(2), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000200013
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Diecson Silva, Rodrigo Zeni, Claudir José Basso

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Contrato de Licenciamento
Este jornal oferece acesso gratuito ao seu conteúdo por meio de seu site, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar pesquisas gratuitamente ao público promove uma grande mudança no conhecimento global.
O conteúdo do site do jornal é distribuído sob a licença Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional.
Os autores podem adotar outros acordos de licenciamento não exclusivos para a distribuição da versão publicada de seu trabalho, desde que a publicação inicial seja indicada neste periódico. É permitido e recomendado que os autores divulguem seus trabalhos na Internet antes e durante o processo de submissão, ou que possam gerar mudanças interessantes e aumentar as citações dos trabalhos publicados.

