Ciencias de los Alimentos/Food Sciences
Cienc Tecn UTEQ (2019) 12(2) p 1-6
ISSN 1390-4051; e-ISSN 1390-4043
Interaction of Salmonella sp. and essential oils: bactericidal activity and
adaptation capacity
Interacción entre Salmonella sp. y aceites esenciales: actividad bactericida y adaptabilidad
Alcilene de Abreu Pereira1, Jorge Pamplona Pagnossa2, João Paulo Alcântara2, Silas Rodrigo Isidoro2, Roberta Hilsdorf Piccoli2*
Food Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Food Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, caixa postal 3037, 37200-000,
Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil
1 Instituto Federal de Minas Gerais - Campus Bambuí. Faz. Varginha - Rodovia Bambuí/Medeiros - km 05, Caixa Postal 05,
2 Universidade Federal de Lavras, Caixa Postal 3037, 37200-000, Lavras, MG, Brazil, rhpiccoli@ufla.br
Rec.: 23.09.2019. Acept.: 05.12.2019.
Publicado el 31 de diciembre de 2019
Abstract
Resumen
acteria of the genus Salmonella, responsible for
a bacteria Salmonella, responsable de numerosos
B
many foodborne disease outbreaks, are capable
L
brotes de intoxicación alimentaria, puede formar
of forming biofilms on various surfaces in the food
biopelículas en varias superficies utilizadas en la
industry. The constant exposure of these bacteria to
industria alimentaria. La exposición constante de
sublethal concentrations of sanitizers has made them
estas bacterias a concentraciones subletales de agentes
tolerant to several of them. Seeking alternatives to
desinfectantes los hace tolerantes a muchos de estos
control of bacterial biofilms and adaptation under
agentes. Buscando alternativas para el control de
sublethal exposure, this study tested the antimicrobial
biofilms adaptadas a condiciones subletales, este
activity of Thymus vulgaris
(thyme) and Origanum
estudio evaluó la actividad antimicrobiana de los aceites
vulgare
(oregano) essential oils
(EOs) and their
esenciales Thymus vulgaris
(tomillo) y Origanum
major compounds, thymol and carvacrol, against
vulgare
(orégano) y sus componentes principales
of Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and
timol y carvacrol contra Salmonella enterica serovares
Typhimurium. Carvacrol 0.25% (v/v) was the most
Enteritidis y Typhimurium. Carvacrol
0.25%
(v/v)
efficient antimicrobial agent against planktonic cells
fue más eficiente contra las células planctónicas de S.
of S. Enteritidis and biofilm were more susceptible to
Enteritidis y su biopelícula fue más sensible al 2.0% (v/v)
oregano EO at 2.0% (v/v). Differently, S. Typhimurium
de orégano EO. S. Typhimurium en forma planctónica
planktonic was inhibited at 0.25% (v/v) of thyme EO
fue inhibida por el tomillo EO a una concentración de
and biofilm was more susceptible to carvacrol (2.5%
0.25% (v/v) y su biopelícula fue más susceptible al
v/v). Adaptation of S. Enteritidis and Typhimurium was
carvacrol (2.5% v/v). S. Enteritidis y S. Typhimurium
observed on all tests (p < 0.05). This study confirms the
se adaptaron a todas las concentraciones subletales de
potential of EOs and its major compounds as alternative
los antimicrobianos probados. Este estudio confirma
sanitizers in the food industry against pathogenic
el uso potencial de EO y sus componentes principales
bacteria such as Salmonella spp. and of possible
como desinfectantes en la industria alimentaria para
adaptation due to sublethal exposure.
controlar bacterias patógenas como Salmonella spp. y su
capacidad para adaptarse a concentraciones subletales.
Keywords: biofilm, planktonic cells, carvacrol, thymol,
stress response.
Palabras clave: biopelículas, células planctónicas,
carvacrol, timol, respuesta al estrés.
1
Pereira et al., 2019
Introduction
2004). EOs are distinguished by high antimicrobial
activity and, in appropriate concentrations, generally
t is well known that the implementation of health
recognized as safe. Thus, it is considered exempt from
I
control measures, cleaning and sanitization in food
food additive tolerance requirements for its use (Smith et
industries can prevent economic loss.Aiming at the safety
al., 2005). Essential oils of Origanum vulgare (oregano)
of their products, the food industry use antimicrobial
and Thymus vulgaris (thyme) contain, among other
agents with varied modes of action, exposure time and
compounds, thymol and carvacrol, which are considered
chemical composition. However, the hygienic programs
powerful bactericides and fungicides
(Kalemba and
have been inefficient and often unable to completely
Kunicka, 2003). Induced stress conditions as exposure
remove bacterial biofilms that accumulate on surfaces
to sublethal concentrations of bactericidal compounds
and equipment of food processing environments, even
are an important evaluation to indicate adaptive capacity
considering all the misfortunes that these contaminations
of microorganisms. However, information on possible
can cause regarding microbiological aspects. Several
effects of using EOs or its compounds at sublethal
factors contribute to this situation, mainly the loss of
concentrations on microbial sensitivity to antimicrobials
susceptibility to antimicrobial agents due to the frequent
or physical processes is still scarce (Souza, 2016).
exposure of pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella, to
The investigation of bacteria challenged with
sublethal concentrations of sanitizers during cleaning
sublethal stresses reveal significant physiological
sessions.
changes that may enhance their ability to survive the
Bacteria of the genus Salmonella are
imposed hostile conditions. In recent literature, a plenty
foodborne pathogens of global coverage and cause
of evidences shows that exposure of bacteria to sublethal
the most outbreak-related in the world (CDC, 2018).
stresses may induce decrease of sensitivity to food
The contamination caused by these Gram-negative
antimicrobials, biocides and other food preservation
rod-shaped microorganisms can bring great losses
techniques (Erickson and Doyle, 2017). Furthermore,
to the food industry through embargoes and taxes
relevant increase of virulence and lower infectious
established by importing countries
(Shinohara et
doses in pathogenic bacteria brings even more concern
al., 2008), and Brazil is a major exporter of meat and
to food antimicrobials, such as essential oils (Gadea et
poultry (Brasil, 2015). Salmonellosis is considered a
al., 2017).
disease of major importance for human health by the
The aim of this work was to evaluate the antimicrobial
high risk of mortality and morbidity. It typically causes
effect of Thymus vulgaris
(thyme) and Origanum
gastroenteritis in humans and the infection is related to
vulgare
(oregano) EOs and its major compounds,
precarious hygiene conditions in poultry farms (Pui et
thymol and carvacrol, against Salmonella Enteritidis
al., 2011).
and Typhimurium serovars testing the adaptive response
Among all Salmonella enterica serotypes,
of their biofilms to sublethal concentrations of these
Typhimurium and Enteritidis are the two most frequently
substances and classifying their biofilm formation
observed in salmonellosis-recorded outbreaks
(Mor-
capacity.
Mur and Yuste, 2010). Salmonella enterica serotypes
can survive in a broad range of temperature (7 to 48 °C),
Material and methods
pH (4.3 to 9.3) and frequently associated to resistance
to common antibiotics and sanitizers (D’Aousts, 1997,
Essential oils and major compounds
McLaren et al., 2011). In addition, Salmonella spp. has
The essential oils of Origanum vulgare (oregano) and
great ability to form biofilms on surfaces and equipment
Thymus vulgaris (thyme) were acquired by Ferquima
of food industries (Steenackers et al., 2012, Fuente-
Indústria e Comercio Ltda (Vargem Grande Paulista, São
Núñez et al.,
2013). Biofilms are cells aggregates
Paulo, Brazil). Oregano EO composition was specified
in which increase significantly the prevalence of
by the supplier pointing carvacrol (71%), γ-terpinene
pathogenic strains in various food environments (Yaron
(4.5%), β-cariofilene (4.0%); p-cimene (3.5%), thymol
& Romling, 2014). Due to the difficulty to control the
(3.0%), while thyme EO contained thymol (47.3%),
development of biofilms formed by Salmonella spp. and
p-cimene (26.8%), γ-terpinene (6.0%), linalol (5.2%),
other microorganisms, the food industry is in need for
carvacrol
(3.1%), α-pinene
(2.2%), mircene (1.4%),
new products with active ingredients with antimicrobial
1.8-cineole (1.3%), borneol (0.9%), canfene (0.8%) and
efficiency and non-toxic to humans.
β-cariofilene (0.8%). In addition, the high-purity major
Essential oils
(EOs) and their components
compounds of thymol (99.5%) and carvacrol (98%)
are renowned to be effective against a wide range of
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich®.
microorganisms, including pathogenic bacteria (Burt,
2
Ciencia y Tecnología. 2019. 12(2):1-6
Interaction of Salmonella sp. and essential oils: bactericidal activity and
adaptation capacity
Microorganisms
0.5% Tween 80 were added in such concentrations (%)
Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovars
(v/v): 0.12; 0.25; 0.50; 1.00; 2.00; 2.50; 3.00; 3.50; 4.00;
Enteritidis S64 and Typhimurium S190 were donated by
4.50; 5.00 and 6.00. After 20 min, tested cultures were
the Laboratory of Enterobacteria (LABENT) at Oswaldo
washed and incubated with addition of TSB during 24h
Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).
followed by TSA plating 37°C for 24h in order to obtain
Stock culture was stored in preservation culture medium
the MBCB. Tests were performed in triplicate and three
and reactivation occurred in Brain Heart Infusion
repetitions using negative (TSB with 0.5% Tween 80
broth (BHI) (HIMEDIA) incubation at 37°C for 24h.
and EO or major compounds) and positive (TSB with
Standard inoculum was obtained by growth curve and
0.5% Tween 80 and inoculum) control.
tests were carried out using 108 CFU/mL. All analysis
were performed in Laboratory of Food Microbiology of
Adaptation homologue of sessile cells to
Federal University of Lavras, Minas Gerais.
antimicrobials
Solution of TSB with 0.5% Tween 80 and
Formation and classification of biofilms
sublethal concentrations (1/4 MBCB) of thyme (0.06%)
Biofilms were formed by inoculation of 50 µL
or oregano (0.12%) EOs, carvacrol (0.12%) or thymol
aliquots of standard cultures into wells containing 150
(0.12%) were added into the wells and inoculated with
µL of TSB followed by incubation at 37°C for 48 hours.
50 µL of standard cultures. The microplates were sealed
Biofilm formation was determined by absorbance
and incubated at 37ºC for 48h. After this period, exposed
measures of crystal violet (0.1% w/v) added into each
cultures were removed, washed and tested against new
well at 600 nm in a microplate reader Anthos 2010
concentrations of EOs and major compounds: 2.00;
(Biochrom®), after wash/dry periods and addition of
2.50; 3.00; 3.50; 4.00; 4.50; 5.00 and 6.00 % (v/v). After
ethanol 95% (v/v) (Merritt et al., 2005). Classification
20 minutes, solutions were removed and washed. Then,
of biofilms followed Stepanović et al. (2000) proposal
TSB was added in order to incubate adapted biofilms
where “Dob” is optical density of biofilm and “Donc”
at 37°C for 24h, followed by TSA plating during 24h
is optical density of negative control: no biofilm former
at 37°C.
(Dob ≤ Donc), weak biofilm former (Donc < Dob ≤
2x Donc), moderate biofilm former (2x Donc < Dob
Results and discussion
≤ 4x Donc) strong biofilm former (4x Donc < Dob).
Final measures were obtained by arithmetic mean of
able
1 displays the minimal bactericidal
absorbance of eight replicates. Statistical analyses were
T
concentrations against planktonic
(MBC) and
performed using Kruskall-Wallis test and SPSS 19.0
sessile (MBCB) cells, and adapted biofilms (MBCBA)
program (p < 0.05).
of EOs and major compounds. Susceptibility tests
revealed that MBC of EOs and major compounds varied
Minimal bactericidal concentration of essential oils
from 0.25 to 1.00 (% v/v) against planktonic cells of
and major compounds against planktonic and sessile
both Salmonella serovars (p < 0.05) and all MBCB were
cells
above 1.00% (v/v).
The minimum bactericidal concentration
EOs and major compounds tested against S.
against planktonic cells (MBC) and biofilms (MBCB)
Enteritidis and Typhimurium biofilms showed higher
of oregano and thyme EOs, thymol and carvacrol was
minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCB) than those
determined using microdilution technique with
96-
obtained against planktonic cells (MBC) and significant
well polystyrene microplates according to CLSI-M100
differences between them were found (p<0.05). Several
(Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2019) with
factors are involved in this increased tolerance of cells
modifications. EOs and major compounds solutions
in biofilms to antimicrobial agents, including the matrix
were diluted in Tryptic soy broth (TSB) (HIMEDIA®),
of extrapolymeric substances (EPS) in which the cells
with addition of
0.5% Tween 80, in concentrations
are embedded limiting the diffusion of antimicrobials.
of (%): 0.03; 0.06; 0.12; 0.25; 0.50 and 1.00 (v/v).
Various substances are also found embedded in the EPS
Then, microplates with 10 µL of standard cultures and
reacting with these agents and reducing their efficiency
solutions were sealed and incubated at 37ºC for 24h,
(Bridier et al., 2011). In addition to EPS, it is known that
followed by Tryptic soy agar
(TSA) (HIMEDIA®)
when in biofilm, cells multiply more slowly, increasing
plating by microdrop technique using 10 µL of each
tolerance to antimicrobials, which is a major concern in
well and 37°C/24h incubation to obtain the MBC of
food safety standards (Srey et al,. 2013).
substances.
It was observable a significant difference
After biofilm formation, cultures were removed,
between carvacrol and thymol MBC and is well known
washed, and EOs and major compounds solutions with
in literature that inactivation of microbial
3
Ciencia y Tecnología. 2019. 12(2):1-6
Pereira et al., 2019
Table 1. Essential oils and major compounds minimal bactericidal concentrations (% v/v) against planktonic
and sessile cells and adapted biofilms of Salmonella serovars
S. Enteritidis
S. Typhimurium
Biocidal
% MBC
MBCB
MBCB
MBC
MBCB
MBCBA
A
Oregano EO
0.5 ±0.07
2.0 ±0.12
5.0 ±0.13
1.0 ± 0.13
3.0 ±0.29
6.0 ±0.25
Thyme EO
0.5 ±0.07
2.5 ±0.12
4.5 ±0.13
0.25 ±0.13
2.5 ±0.29
3.0 ±0.25
Thymol
0.5 ±0.07
3.0 ±0.12
6.0 ±0.13
0.5 ±0.13
5.0 ±0.29
6.0 ±0.25
Carvacrol
0.25 ±0.07
2.5 ±0.12
4.5 ±0.13
0.5 ±0.13
2.5 ±0.29
5.0 ±0.25
enzymes is also related to the presence of the
response to environmental stress that promote increased
hydroxyl group in monoterpenes (Bakkali et al., 2008).
and / or decreased gene expression leading to higher
The group can interact with the cell membrane causing
tolerance to this or other types of stress (e.g. thermal),
leakage of cellular components through membrane.
allowing this pathogen to survive in food processing
Thymol
(4-isopropyl-2-metylphenol) and carvacrol
environments. This adaptation can also lead to increased
(2-isopropyl-5-metylphenol) are isomers differing only
virulence and resistance to several antimicrobial
by the position of hydroxyl group. This difference in the
agents
(Spector & Kenyon, 2012). However, it is not
positions changes the reactivity of each compound since
completely understood in regard of the adaptability of
most of the reactions must occur by interaction with the
bacteria to essential oils and their compounds both in
hydroxyl group. It is possible that, in carvacrol tests, the
planktonic and sessile forms (Oloketuyi & Khan, 2017;
steric hindrance performed by methyl is much smaller
Rossi et al., 2017).
than propyl performs on thymol, due to its size and
Phenotypic changes caused in Salmonella by
number of present atoms. In methyl, there is only one
exposure to sublethal concentrations of oils and their
carbon and three hydrogen atoms to hinder interaction
compounds have been reported. The exposure to
with the hydroxyl group while in thymol, propyl offers
sub-lethal concentrations of thyme and oregano EO
three carbon and seven hydrogen atoms to that effect
and carvacrol, thymol, trans-2-hexenal and citral of
(Mastelic et al,. 2008, Hyldgaard et al., 2012, Meeran
Listeria monocytogenes, S. Enteritidis and Escherichia
et al., 2017).
coli induced a marked increase of some membrane
Both serotypes were capable to adapt to tested
associated fatty acids, particularly unsaturated fatty
antimicrobial compounds. The comparison between
acids, trans-isomers, and specific released free fatty
MBCB and MBCBA shows significant differences
acids (Siroli et al. 2015). S. Enteritidis 86 (SE86) grown
(p<0.05) among biofilm adaptational conditions.
in sublethal concentrations of oregano EO and carvacrol
Much higher concentrations were required to inhibit S.
exhibited alteration in gene expression associated with
Enteritidis biofilm adapted in sublethal doses of EOs and
repair of cell damage caused by osmotic, oxidative, acid
major compounds solutions, suggesting an increased
stress and thermal shock (Cariri et al., 2019). However,
tolerance to antimicrobial agents when exposed to
the study was not evaluated if increased tolerance to
mild-stress conditions. Statistically significant values in
antimicrobial has occurred. In another study, Salmonella
different concentrations compared by Kruskall-Wallis
Senftenberg, isolated from an outbreak linked to the
test
(α = 0.05) revealed that thyme EO showed no
herb Ocimum basilicum L. (basil) adapted to linalool
significant difference between biofilm and adaptation to
with a minimal inhibitory concentration increasing of
sublethal concentrations to S. Typhimurium.
at least 8-fold and conferred heterologous adaptation
Table 2 displays the optical densities of biofilms
to the antibiotics trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole,
exposed to sublethal concentrations of EOs and major
piperacillin, chloramphenicol and tetracycline (Kalily
compounds in order to classify them. According
et al., 2017)isolated from an outbreak linked to the herb
to Stepanović et al.
(2000) classification, it can be
Ocimum basilicum L. (basil. These information shows
observed that both strains, even after culturing in the
that exposure to inadequate concentrations of EOs or
presence of sublethal concentrations of antimicrobials,
major compounds can also increase bacterial tolerance
remain considered as “strongly biofilm forming”.
to other stressors in the processing environment, leading
The response to environmental stress of
to bacterial persistence in industry and food.
microorganisms is well-known by factors such as
For biofilm cells, similar results to this study
temperature, pH, osmolality, antibiotics and sanitizers.
were obtained by Zou et al. (2012). The biofilm and
In addition, Salmonella sp. activates regulators in
dispersed cells of S. Typhimurium showed higher
4
Ciencia y Tecnología. 2019. 12(2):1-6
Interaction of Salmonella sp. and essential oils: bactericidal activity and
adaptation capacity
Table 2. Biofilm formation capacity of the two serotypes of Salmonella grown in presence of sublethal
concentration of essential oils and major components
Sublethal
Conc.
Biofilm
Serotype
DOA
DOCN
stress
(%)
class.
Enteritidis
control
0.0
0.27+0.02
0.06+0.002
FFB
Oregano EO
0.25
0.29+0.02
0.06+0.002
FFB
Thyme EO
0.12
0.27+0.02
0.06+0.002
FFB
thymol
0.12
0.28+0.02
0.06+0.002
FFB
carvacrol
0.06
0.30+0.03
0.06+0.002
FFB
Typhimurium
control
0.0
0.29+0.02
0.06+0.002
FFB
Oregano EO
0.12
0.30+0.02
0.06+0.002
FFB
Thyme EO
0.06
0.28+0.03
0.06+0.002
FFB
thymol
0.12
0.29+0.03
0.06+0.002
FFB
carvacrol
0.12
0.34+0.02
0.06+0.002
FFB
Non biofilm forming - NF (Doa < Docn), Weakly biofilm forming - FF, (Docn < Doa ≤ 2 x Docn), moderately
biofilm forming - MF MF (2 x Docn < Doa ≤ 4 x Docn), and strongly biofilm forming- FFB (4 x Docn < Doa).
Where Doa is biofilm optical density and Docn, negative growth control optical density.
resistance to antimicrobials, allyl isothiocyanate,
2015. Projeções do Agronegócio: Brasil 2014/2015 a
thymol, eugenol and polyphenol, than the planktonic
2024/2025, Assessoria de Gestão Estratégica. Brasília,
cells after cultivation in the presence of sublethal
p. 100.
concentrations of the compounds. In this regard, the
Bridier, A., Briandet, R., Thomas, V., and Dubois-Brissonnet,
potential use of essential oils and its major compounds as
F. 2011. Resistance of bacterial biofilms to disinfectants:
alternative sanitizers raises awareness to concentration
a review. Biofouling 27(9): 1017-1032.
adjustment in order to avoid sublethal exposure leading
Burt, S. 2004. Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and
to microbial adaptation and persistence on common
potential applications in foods -a review. Int. J. Food
food industry surfaces.
Microbiol. 94(3): 223-53.
Cariri, M.L., de Melo, A.N.F., Mizzi, L., Ritter, A.C., Tondo,
Conclusions
E., de Souza, E.L., Valdramidis, V., and Magnani, M.
2019. Quantitative assessment of tolerance response to
arvacrol and thyme EO were more efficient against
stress after exposure to oregano and rosemary essential
C
planktonic cells of S. Enteritidis and Typhimurium,
oils, carvacrol and 1,8-cineole in Salmonella Enteritidis
respectively, while oregano EO showed better
86 and its isogenic deletion mutants ∆dps, ∆rpoS and
performance against S. Enteritidis biofilms. Adaptation
∆ompR. Food Res. Int. 122: 679-687.
was observed on all treatments and both serovars were
CDC. 2018. CDC estimates of foodborne illness in the United
classified as strong biofilm formers, proving the high
States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
risk of resistance development of Salmonella sp. to
CLSI.
2019. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial
sublethal doses of EOs and major compounds.
Susceptibility Testing
(29th Ed.) CLSI supplement
M-100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
Acknowledgement
D’Aousts J. 1997. Salmonella species. Food Microbiology
- Fundamentals and Frontiers. Microbiological
Authors thank FAPEMIG, CAPES, CNPq and
Specifications of Food Pathogens. A S M Press: 129-158,
UFLA for the financial support and scholarship.
Washinghton.
Erickson, M.C., and Doyle, M.P. 2017. The challenges of
References
eliminating or substituting antimicrobial preservatives
in foods. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 8(1): 371-390.
Bakkali, F., Averbeck, S., Averbeck, D., and Idaomar, M.
Fuente-Núñez, C., Reffuveille, F., Fernández, L., and
2008. Biological effects of essential oils - A review.
Hancock, R.E. 2013. Bacterial biofilm development as
Food Chem. Toxicol. 46: 446-475.
a multicellular adaptation: antibiotic resistance and new
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento.
therapeutic strategies. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 16(5):
5
Ciencia y Tecnología. 2019. 12(2):1-6
Pereira et al., 2019
580-589.
Machado, E.D.C.L., Dutra, R.A.F., and Lima Filho,
Gadea, R., Glibota, N., Pérez Pulido, R., Gálvez, A., and
J.L. De.
2008. Salmonella spp., importante agente
Ortega, E. 2017. Effects of exposure to biocides on
patogênico veiculado em alimentos. Cien. Saude Colet.
susceptibility to essential oils and chemical preservatives
13(5): 1675-1683.
in bacteria from organic foods. Food Control 80: 176-
Siroli, L., Patrignani, F., Gardini, F., and Lanciotti, R. 2015.
182.
Effects of sub-lethal concentrations of thyme and
Hyldgaard, M., Mygind, T., and Meyer, R. L. 2012. Essential
oregano essential oils, carvacrol, thymol, citral and
oils in food preservation: mode of action, synergies, and
trans-2-hexenal on membrane fatty acid composition
interactions with food matrix components. Frontiers in
and volatile molecule profile of Listeria monocytogenes,
microbiology 3: 12.
Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis. Food Chem.
Kalemba, D.A.A.K. and Kunicka, A., 2003. Antibacterial and
182: 185-192.
antifungal properties of essential oils. Current medicinal
Smith, R.L., Cohen, S.M., Doull, J., Feron, V.J., Goodman, J.I.,
chemistry 10(10): 813-829.
Marnett, L.J., Portoghese, P.S., Waddell, W.J., Wagner,
Kalily, E., Hollander, A., Korin, B., Cymerman, I., and Yaron,
B.M., Hall, R.L. and Higley, N.A. 2005. A procedure for
S.
2017. Adaptation of Salmonella enterica serovar
the safety evaluation of natural flavor complexes used
Senftenberg to linalool and its association with antibiotic
as ingredients in food: essential oils. Food and chemical
resistance and environmental persistence. Appl. Environ.
toxicology 43(3): 345-363.
Microbiol. 83(10): e03398-16.
Souza, E.L. 2016. The effects of sublethal doses of essential
Mastelic, J., Jerkovic, I., Blaževic, I., Poljak-Blaži, M.,
oils and their constituents on antimicrobial susceptibility
Borovic, S., Ivancic-Bace, I., Smrecki, V., Žarkovic, N.,
and antibiotic resistance among food-related bacteria: a
Brcic-Kostic, K., Vikic-Topic, D., and Müller, N. 2008.
review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 56: 1-12.
Comparative study on the antioxidant and biological
Spector, M.P., and Kenyon, W.J. 2012. Resistance and survival
activities of carvacrol, thymol, and eugenol derivatives.
strategies of Salmonella enterica to environmental
Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 56(11): 3989-
stresses. Food Res. Int. 45(2): 455-481.
3996.
Srey, S., Jahid, I.K., and Ha, S.D. 2013. Biofilm formation
McLaren, I., Wales, A., Breslin, M. and Davies, R. 2011.
in food industries: a food safety concern. Food control
Evaluation of commonly-used farm disinfectants in
31(2): 572-585.
wet and dry models of Salmonella farm contamination.
Steenackers, H., Hermans, K., Vanderleyden, J., and De
Avian Pathology 40(1): 33-42.
Keersmaecker, S.C.J.
2012. Salmonella biofilms: an
Meeran, N., Fizur, M., Javed, H., Al Taee, H., Azimullah,
overview on occurrence, structure, regulation and
S., and Ojha, S.K. 2017. Pharmacological properties
eradication. Food Res. Int. 45(2): 502-531.
and molecular mechanisms of thymol: prospects for its
Stepanović, S., Vuković, D., Dakić, I., Savić, B., and Švabić-
therapeutic potential and pharmaceutical development.
Vlahović, M. 2000. A modified microtiter-plate test for
Frontiers in pharmacology 8: 380.
quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J.
Merritt, J.H., Kadouri, D.E., and O’Toole, G.A. 2005. Growing
Microbiol. Methods 40(2): 175-179.
and Analyzing Static Biofilms. In: John Wiley and Sons,
Yaron, S. and Römling, U. 2014. Biofilm formation by
Inc., Current Protocols in Microbiology. Hoboken, NJ,
enteric pathogens and its role in plant colonization and
USA.
persistence. Microbial biotechnology 7(6): 496-516.
Mor-Mur, M., and Yuste, J.
2010. Emerging bacterial
Zou, Y., Woo, J., and Ahn, J. 2012. Cellular and molecular
pathogens in meat and poultry: an overview. Food
responses of Salmonella Typhimurium to antimicrobial-
Bioprocess Technol. 3(1): 24-35.
induced stresses during the planktonic-to-biofilm
Pui, C.F., Wong, W.C., Chai, L.C., Tunung, R., Jeyaletchumi,
transition. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 55(4): 274-282.
P., Hidayah, N., Ubong, A., Farinazleen, M.G., Cheah,
Y.K. and Son, R.
2011. Salmonella: A foodborne
pathogen. International Food Research Journal 18(2):
465-473.
Oloketuyi, S.F. and Khan, F. 2017. Inhibition strategies of
Listeria monocytogenes biofilms—Current knowledge
and future outlooks. Journal of basic microbiology
57(9): 728-743.
Rossi, D.A., Melo, R.T., Mendonça, E.P. and Monteiro, G.P.
2017. Biofilms of Salmonella and Campylobacter in the
poultry industry. Poultry Science InTech. (Feb): 93-113.
Shinohara, N.K.S., Barros, V.B. De, Jimenez, S.M.C.,
6
Ciencia y Tecnología. 2019. 12(2):1-6